Re: Re: Re: Re: Lying

[ Post a new reply ] [ Back to the message board ]

This message was posted by MM, posted on June 09, 1999 coming from 152.163.213.51
This message is a reply to Re: Re: Re: Lying posted from Trig posted at June 08, 1999

> >
> > > Now this is a tough question! I believe that it would be ok to lie if it would be to protect the life of another, under certain circumstances of course. I think it mostly lies in the motivation of the lie, and what the outcome of the lie would be. With Rahab, she lied to help protect the people of God, otherwise they might have been killed. I'm sure you can really do an indepth study, and come out with some great principles, but I'd say that the basic rule would be to not lie at all, but you must always remember, except for the process of salvation, there are ALWAYS exceptions to the norm.

> > Hay Alex!

> > Are there always exceptions to the norm? - especially if the norm is the Ten Commandments? If Jesus was in the same position as Rahab - do you think He would have lied?
> > At the time Rahab was an unbeliever. I do not think that God was rewarding her for the act - but because she feared God. The act she did was done in ignorance and unbelief, but she knew that Jericho was to be destroyed so she did what she thought right and God rewarded her for it.
> > I do not believe that her life and situation at the time could apply to us in today's society - could you, Alex, be more clear about what you mean concerning "lying to save someone's life" maybe an example?

> > Your bro,
> > -Rob}}}}

> First off, God wouldn't have blessed her if she was going against His will. God is not the author of sin, thus Rahab was not sinning by her actions.

> A possible example of what I was talking about might take place like this:

> A horrible man is stalking a girl. He harrasses her, and bothers her. The girl tells her parents about the man, and they put a restraining order on him. One night, in a fit of rage, the man breaks into the girl's house with intent to attack her. The father tells the girl to hide herself. The man finds the father and asks where his daughter is. The father lies to the man, and tells him that the girl isn't around the house. In rage the man kills the father instead, and leaves. The father has protected the life of his daughter, and at the same time he lied at the very last moment of his life.

> Now tell me Rob, was this man sinning by protecting his daughter's life? I know this is just an example, but situations like this DO happen. Not only would it be the father's responsiblity to protect his daughter, but I feel that the man would in no way be held accountable for this action.

Ok, Rob...what about Surprise Parties?



Responses to this messages: